Chelmsford Crown Court

Very neglected and outdated lazy can’t be bothered staff in reception. Tannoy system useless no beverages on offer and no cups for water fountain that looks like it’s got covid, filthy. No communication between downstairs and first floor shambles and no one cares.

Poor service. Told to call court direct, number given an abrupt lady told me another 3 numbers, no reply. Very poor

Not the very best place for justice for death by burning.....

Family court.Unveiling the Inequitable Treatment of Fathers in Child Custody CasesChild custody battles have long been a sensitive and complex issue, with the welfare of the child at the heart of every decision. However, recent claims of bias and unfairness in the courtroom have brought attention to the plight of fathers who feel marginalized and denied their rights. This essay aims to shed light on the alleged feminist bias of Judge Capon from Chelmsford County Court and Polly Plampin from children social services, exploring the impact of their actions on fathers' rights and the need for a fairer and more impartial judicial system.Firstly, it is important to address the claim that Judge Capon is biased due to his alleged feminist leanings. While it is imperative to approach these accusations with caution, the claim that he was winking at a female barrister during court proceedings raises concerns regarding his objectivity. Such actions can be perceived as unprofessional and potentially indicative of favoritism. However, it is crucial to gather concrete evidence to support these claims before passing judgment. Can be collected from recordings in court room the evidence. When proven true, it would undermine the impartiality of the courtroom, thereby jeopardizing the rights of fathers seeking custody of their children.Similarly, the allegations against Polly Plampin from children social services for dishonesty in her reports cannot be taken lightly. The reliability and accuracy of social service reports play a pivotal role in custody decisions. If Plampin is indeed fabricating or distorting information which she does, it would not only compromise the integrity of the system but also perpetuate unfair outcomes. Accurate and unbiased reports are essential for ensuring that the best interests of the child are truly prioritized.Furthermore, the claim that fathers are denied the opportunity to speak their mind in court is deeply troubling. The right to be heard and present one's case is a fundamental principle of justice. By silencing fathers and insisting on legal representation for any form of communication, Judge Capon not only disregards their rights but also impedes their ability to advocate for themselves effectively. This unjust treatment undermines the credibility and fairness of the legal process.The final order made by Judge Capon without allowing the father to speak further strengthens the argument of bias and unfairness. The duty of a judge is to evaluate all relevant evidence and arguments before making a decision that serves the best interests of the child. By dismissing the father's perspective and proceeding without his input, Judge Capon fails to fulfill this duty. This disregard for the father's rights not only undermines the legitimacy of the final order but also perpetuates a system that is biased against fathers.In conclusion:The allegations of feminist bias against Judge Capon and the perceived dishonesty of Polly Plampin highlight the urgent need for a more impartial and fair judicial system in child custody cases. Fathers deserve equal rights and opportunities to present their case, ensuring that their voice is heard and their perspective is considered. The alleged actions of Judge Capon and Plampin compromise the integrity of the courtroom, ultimately undermining the best interests of the child. It is imperative that steps be taken to address these concerns, fostering an environment that promotes fairness, equality, and the well-being of all parties involved. Only then can we truly achieve a just and balanced child custody system.

If you get put through to Emma chaplin you might as well give up your case now

Friendly front desk and reception serviceKnowledgeable and informative staffClean and tidy surroundingsWheelchair accessibleLifts and disabled toiletsOverall nice atmosphere.

Human rights not respected at all. Terrible experience with court room

The court address is new London street if you put new street into your sat nav you will end up miles away staff in the court were very very helpful and polite