Sprowston Police Station

Finally, regarding the Modus Operandi from last year,which has not been addressed at all. Crime report 36/17339/ PART 1What was the time of the report, as it is not listed for the 5th March 2020 & why is that?Please state what/which specific swear words were used, in which sentences & how many times used?How high was the walking stick raised ? How many times was this allegedly done? It is stated that it was waved about in a threatening manner. How was this determined?It is stated that I allegedly threatened the manager with the walking stick,Who is making this statement ?? or the police officer typing out the report?With whom was I allegedly arguing with? And with whom was I allegedly shouting at?It is stated that the controlled drug will be delivered, to who or where?Who gave the police a quotation that I was supposed to have said.?And which police officer entered it on this report? As it has not been accurately transcribed on the report.On the report dated the 10th March 2020 08.45am PC ?? states in the text box; No offence has occurred,the walking stick was raised during the incident. I have considered a public order offence.However there is NO EVIDENCE to suggest this has happened,NO swear words or abusive language was used.; Questions; how high was the walking stick raised off the ground? Why is this log entered five days after alleged incident? The report goes onto state that;this incident has lead to Taryn being removed from Acle medical practice & dispensary due to have ongoing confrontation with staff as she like to collect her partners medication early. She has been referred to Norwich medical practice. At 09.41am Closing report & states No offence has occurred.Has been removed from Acle gp surgery.Then for some unknown reason this is altered on the 12th March 2020.By Staff 36 11096 ? (who?) Guidance; Classification amended by IMU from ASB_Nuisance to Sec 5 POA Harassment,alarm or distress as Suspect was verbally abusive & shouting in the public area of the surgery-PVH points to prove says S5 POA is made out if a person uses threatening,abusive or disorderly behaviour within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused h/a/d & this would appear to be what has happened,So please can you explain why this was & what prompted it to be ? What abusive language was used or what threatening behaviour? The words to prove" were used-so how was this proved by cctv or written statements

Prompt response to my burgalry.